Ou beau chastel est prisonnier mon cueur 3v · Anonymous
Appearance in the group of related chansonniers:
*Leuven ff. 63v-65 »Ou beau chastel est prisonnier mon cueur« 3v · Edition · Facsimile
This page with edition as a PDF
Text: Rondeau cinquain, full text in Leuven.
Ou beau chastel est prisonnier mon cueur Painne et soussi, tristesse et doleur Ou beau chastel est prisonnier mon cueur A qui donner de ce cas ycy l’erreur Ou beau chastel est prisonnier mon cueur |
In the fair castle my heart is a prisoner Trouble and worry, sadness and pain In the fair castle my heart is a prisoner On whom to lay the blame for this situation In the fair castle my heart is a prisoner |
1) Line 3, “beaulte bonte courtoisie aussi”, one syllable short (error)
Comments on text and music:
The unique rondeau cinquain was entered into the Leuven chansonnier by its main scribe with a few errors in the text and music. It is a male love complaint in rich rimes and set in music for two nearly equal voices (a-c’’ and g-bb’) – the lower voice of the two is named “Tenor” in the MS – and a low contratenor (G-c’), which keeps below the upper voices. It is a very varied setting characterised by several two-part passages; both sections of the rondeau start with duos. This feature and a motif, which appear in both sections, prompted Adam Knight Gilbert to point out that “Ou beau chastel” and Ockeghem’s »Fors seullement l’actente que je meure« “... share striking similarities, including the melodic outline of their opening duos, the imitation of the subject in the cantus (bb. 1-7), and the sequential motive in the tenor (bb. 21-28) ...”. (1) It is evident that the composer of “Ou beau chastel” knew “Fors seullement” intimately. “Fors seullement” is in Leuven chansonnier on ff. 54v-56, some pages before “Ou beau chastel”, and it is precisely this version of Ockeghem’s song that he knew. The motif that begins the song and appears several times in different contexts, a descending movement rhythmized as a dotted semibrevis and two semiminimae, appear at the beginning of “Fors seullement” in Leuven and Wolfenbüttel chansonniers, while other sources are slightly different. (2) This version is in A with no hexachordal signatures. “Ou beau chastel” is in the same modality a tone lower in G, as it ends with two-flat signatures in all voices in the second section. In the first section superius and contratenor have only one flat each, which produces a tonal shading between the sections.
It leads nowhere to wonder if Ockeghem or another musician of his rank could be the author of “Ou beau chastel”. The similarities with Ockeghem's song are immediately audible, but the differences are almost more noticeable. This is not a song where a beautiful, well-articulated tune sounds in the tenor moved up an octave. In “Ou beau chastel” the highest voice is leading, and it is mostly the superius, although the two equal voices often change places, and the melodic material is first presented in the contratenor. A good guess for an author could be the musician who composed at least three of the unique songs in Leuven’s eighth fascicle.
The contratenor presents the first line of text in a melodic gesture that could resemble a recitation formula, and which, with its four repeated notes on c', more associates with the opening duo in the four-part unique virelais simple, »Donnez l'aumosne, chiere dame«, which can be found in Leuven as no. 31 on ff. 47v-50, than with “Fors seullement”. The tenor’s countervoice to this consists of the descending figure alluding to “Fors seullement” and continues in very simple counterpoint in alternating unisons and thirds, ending in a cadence to G. The contratenor tune is then repeated by the superius an octave higher with a new accompaniment in the lower voices, which have to draw the last words of the line far out. The tenor’s adherence to the c’-hexachord contrasts with the repeated e’-flats in the first presentation.
The start of the second line overlaps the not strongly marked cadence to C in bars 16-20. The tenor starts in bar 20 a unison imitation, which turns into imitation at the fifth, when the music thins out to a duo in parallel thirds. With the contratenor in support, the line is brought to a cadence on C again (b. 37), now in a sound dominated by flats with the tenor changing into the hexachord on bb. The upper voice calmly reaches its highest note c’’ in the third line’s enumeration of the lady’s virtues, and goes back again to a cadence on G prolonged into an open middle point with the notated b-natural sounding in the fermata chord.
The oscillation between E-flat and E-natural, which characterized the first section, is in the second section replaced by a signature change into two flats in all voices. An upper voice duo in parallel thirds starting with the small rhythmical motif from the tenor’s opening leads again to a cadence in C. It continues in a new duo between superius and contratenor ending on E-flat, where the upper voice duo comes back in a short unison imitation, and the fourth line of text and firmly ending in E-flat with all three voices sounding. The last line leads to a cadence on G with a final marking of the little motif. In the curious final cadence, where the composer conflates two different cadential formulas, he probably has forgotten that he in the superius had used the old-fashioned under-third formula, when he wrote the confused tenor, which belongs to a song in undiminished tempus.
It is probably true that the composer found inspiration in the sound and layout of Ockeghem’s “Fors seullement”, just as the probably same musician was inspired by Ockeghem in »Si vous voulez que je vous ame« (no. 34, ff. 52v-54), found in Leuven just before “Fors seullement”. Like that song, “Ou beau chastel” fulfils all imaginable requirements for varietas in the setting of the words, and in contrasts between the sections, and it is quite a successful attempt. However, the use of introductory duos, and the mosaic of duos in the second section combined with the reliance on parallel thirds and simplified counterpoint seem to point more in the direction of a young musician experienced in sacred music in the years around 1470 than a composer of secular music, just as was the case with several of the songs in Leuven's eighth fascicle.
Parts of this text are included in my publication The unica of the Leuven chansonnier – a portfolio of songs by an ambitious young musician, August 2024.
PWCH July 2024
1) Adam Knight Gilbert, ‘Songs that Know Each Other in the Leuven Chansonnier’, Journal of the Alamire Foundation 12 (2020), pp. 231-261, at p. 234.
2) See further the comments on “Fors seullement” at http://chansonniers.pwch.dk/CH/CH056.html.